I stumbled upon something recently. It's something that I'm pretty sure other people have mentioned to me before, but I never thought too much about it until the end of last week. It's called Pandora Radio, and it's found at http://www.pandora.com/. I know, I know, original web address.
This is quite possibly the coolest thing I've ever seen, well, other than this amazing baby preacher:
Makes me wonder what type of church this kid goes to! But back to the point at hand. You simply type in an artist that you like, and it will search for artists with similar musical... whatevers... sound, style, etc. Right now, I have 5 radio stations: 12 Stones, Chris Rice, Modest Mussorgsky, Gregorian Chant and Alison Krauss.
To quote a friend of mine, "If you look at my iPod, you'd guess that I was either an old lady or an angry teenager." Well, I guess I can say something similar; except, I don't have an iPod; I have Pandora. The box is open...
I've Opened the Box... Pandora's Box...
Tweet This
Posted by
Anonymous
on Monday, September 15, 2008
Labels:
Computer,
Life in General,
Music
/
Comments: (0)
Bad Decisions...
On Monday morning, when I get up and look at how my fantasy football team fared the day before, there's always a lot of second-guessing going on. "Oh, if I had played, X instead of Z, then I'd be up by 34 points going into the Monday Night Game." That's about what I'm saying this morning, but before I get into my fantasy recap for the weekend (oh yeah, I won 76-74 last week..), I'd like to talk about another bad decision, this one made my Major League Baseball.
As many know, Ike played quite a bit of havoc in the great state of Texas at the tail end of last week. One of the more inconsequential things that happened, was that the Cubs-Astros series scheduled for Houston was postponed. MLB decided to play the series at a "neutral" site in which Houston would be the "home" team. The problem is, the "neutral" site was located in a city that is nearly 1100 miles closer for the "away" team than the "home" team. That's right, the Cubs-Astros series is being played in apparently MLB's favorite "home away from home" Miller Park. (If you'll remember, the Indians and Mariners started their 2007 season at Miller Park when it snowed in Cleveland.)
Here's where the "neutral" site theory breaks down.
1) Houston, as said before, is nearly 1100 miles further away from Milwaukee than Chicago. If the Cardinals had to play a make-up game in Louisville, you can bet that I would make as much of an effort as possible to drive those 90+ miles to see them play, but if they were playing in Denver, there is no way that I'd go. (Denver to Indy is about the same distance as Houston to Milwaukee.)
2) Houston is trying to catch Milwaukee in the Wild Card standings. Milwaukee, at 7.5 games back, pretty much has no chance of catching Chicago in the standings, but are still fighting for the Wild Card, with Philly tied right now, and Houston only 2 games back (additionally, the Cardinals are 4.5 back, but fading fast). In other words, Milwaukee fans would much rather see Chicago win than Houston.
Houston is at a distinct disadvantage in playing these three "home" games at Miller Park. Perhaps what compounds the stupidity of playing there in the first place is that the Rangers were out of town this weekend, and they could have easily played in Arlington (where they only got .5 an inch of rain) instead of Milwaukee. Now Zambrano is a pretty good pitcher, but are you going to seriously tell me that he throws a no-no if they are playing in front of a Houston-friendly crowd? Doubtful, highly doubtful. Okay, back to my original reason for posting: fantasy football.
It's always fun watching some of the games on Sunday and thinking about who is sitting on my bench. And by fun, I mean "gut-wrenching." For example, I have Peyton Manning as my QB. For Manning, I have instituted the "Albert Pujols" rule - he is always first on my draft board, regardless of what the experts say (you know, those same experts that said Larry Johnson was a can't miss first overall pick last season). Last time the Colts played the NFC North teams, Manning torched them. I mean seriously torched them. Throwing for at least 4 TD's in each game if I remember correctly. That was the season that he threw 49 TD passes, and I think nearly half of those were against the NFC North (okay, that may be exaggerating a little, but not a whole lot).
Manning had a decent game yesterday. Threw for 311 yards and 1 TD. Of course, he also threw 2 picks, but overall, a 14 point performance. Not bad, until I look at my bench. Do you know who my backup is? Aaron Rogers, who threw for 328, 3 TD's and even ran for 25 yards. Throw in a lost fumble, and Rogers comes out with 25 points yesterday. DANG IT!!
Now, I won't say I was intently watching it, but as I was doing some work on the couch yesterday afternoon, the Vikings-Colts game was on the TV, a game featuring both of my kickers, and which one did I have starting? Vinatieri, who had 5 points - 1 PAT and 1 FG. Longwell, who was sitting on the bench, kicks 5 field goals (2 for 40+ yards, and another for 50+ yards) and racks up 19 points.
Add those in, and there an extra 25 points that could be padding my lead this morning. I'm up by 18 points, which sounds like a lot, but the guy I'm up against has T.O., Witten and Akers going tonight (not to mention McGahee's game was postponed, and will probably come back to bite me in November when it is made up). I'm not as comfortable with an 18 point lead as I would be with a 43 point lead. I just might lose on tonight's game.
All that being said, I did make one good decision: Tennessee DEF, 17 points; San Diego DEF, -1 point. How's that for a silver lining?
Discipline and Love
Tweet This
Posted by
Anonymous
on Friday, September 12, 2008
Labels:
Life in General,
Ministry,
Reflections,
Scripture
/
Comments: (1)
A few weeks back, I was at a baseball game with my wife and some of her co-workers. For some reason, the conversation turned to the book of Joshua for a few minutes; more specifically, Joshua 10 where the sun stands still. One of her co-workers, we'll call him "Nedwardo," said something along the lines of, "That's not my God. My God wouldn't stop the sun so that more people would get slaughtered."
Now, a baseball game is not exactly the right time to get into a theological debate on idolatry and God's righteousness (especially not with somebody that has some control over where your next appointment will be, but that's another story), but I wanted to tell him that he should probably re-examine his "god" in light of the biblical text and look at how Yahweh has revealed himself to the people of Israel. I wanted to tell him that he wasn't making a nicer version of God in discounting that which was revealed in Scripture, just an idol. I wanted to ask him how he felt justified in placing judgement on the creator of the universe. But I didn't. I kept watching the game (a thrilling 1-0 win for the home team), and reflected some more on what he had to say.
Not long ago, Katie and I had a discussion stemming from his comment and a discussion that she had with her small group about the image of God in the Old Testament (OT) versus the image in the New Testament (NT). It's the old "God of love vs. God of wrath" debate. The more I think about it, the more I come to understand the depth of God's love. It's not like God didn't show love and compassion in the OT, and it's not like Jesus doesn't show wrath in the NT. What we see consistently is a balance between love and, not so much wrath but, righteous judgement.
It's not like God is angry all the time in the OT, but God does bring righteous judgement on those who fail to live a life that is pleasing and honoring to God. We don't see a similar self-righteous indignation from people such as Nedwardo when it comes to the seige and exile of Israel and Judah. And why is that? We know the whole story. We know that God was patient with Israel and Judah. Seriously. It was centuries of turning away from God before they were exiled. But, there's this sense of self-righteousness when it comes to the Israelites conquering the Promised Land. This false sense that the God of the OT is in some way vengeful and heartless. Yet, we miss the fact that these very people are being judged by God. The just punishment for turning to false idols, for placing their trust in something other than the one true Creator, and for placing themselves above the most Holy God (Afterall, isn't that what idolatry is in the first place? Placing ourselves above God?). It wasn't shocking or deplorable when it was happening to Israel, why would it be so when it happened to the Canaanites?
We aren't getting a picture of a different, hot-headed Yahweh in the OT that just needed some time to chill out before the NT rolled around. We're getting a glimpse of the seriousness of sin. We're getting a glimpse of a Father disciplining His children. We're getting a glimpse of true holiness - that which cannot tolerate sin. When you walk through a grocery store and see someone disciplining his/her child, you don't assume that they're terrible parents. You don't see the love and compassion that comes out when they are at home playing in the backyard, and everything is going as it should. When you use your selective seeing, then, yes, God does seem to be harsh and vengeful in the OT, but you're not looking at the whole picture.
Sometimes there needs to be discipline because there is love. Parents who don't discipline their children aren't doing them any favors. They aren't showing their love for the child by not discipling them. They are showing a complete lack of concern for what their children do. Love and discipline are not mutually exclusive. It is when they are balanced that true love shines through.
First Thoughts
I downloaded Google's new web browser today. It's pretty neat. I certainly has been running a lot faster than Internet Explorer has to this point. When you open up a new tab, it has a preview of your most commonly accessed websites, which is pretty cool. There's about six of them on there. I gotta say, I'm not much of a tech guy, but I like it so far!
Fantasy Football
I'm kinda in between meetings right now in my busy day, so I thought I'd take just a couple of minutes to throw out a little info on the ol' blog (I say "ol' " as if I've actually been using this particular blog for a long time...).
Here's my starting lineup for my fantasy football team this week:
QB: Peyton Manning
RB: Darren McFadden
RB: Jamal Lewis
WR: Jerricho Cotchery
WR: Chris Chambers
WR: Marvin Harrison
TE: Kellen Winslow
K: Adam Vinatieri
DEF: San Diego
And my picks:
Giants, Bengals, Jaguars, Jets, Patriots, Saints, Eagles, Steelers, Lions, Seahawks, Chargers, Cardinals, Cowboys, Colts, Vikings and Broncos.
For my survival football (pick one team, if they lose, you're done):
Eagles over Rams
And finally, for my salary cap football:
QB: D. Brees
RB: J. Lewis
RB: D. McFadden
WR: A. Battle
WR: R. Wayne
WR: Ca. Johnson
TE: J. Witten
K: R. Bironas
DEF: Indianapolis
Come Monday/Tuesday morning, I'll either look like a genius or an idiot.
The Irony of Fantasy Baseball
Tweet This
Posted by
Anonymous
on Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Labels:
Baseball,
Fantasy Sports,
Sports
/
Comments: (0)
I've been participating in Yahoo! Fantasy leagues for quite some time now. I have primarily played in the football leagues, because they are shorter and easier to keep up with than the baseball leagues, but recently, I have found the joy in the head-to-head style of fantasy baseball. When it comes to compiling the stats, I tend to get disinterested rather quickly; however, when it is a head-to-head, my guys vs. your guys for a week at a time, I can pay attention to that.
My team didn't finish very strong this year in the regular season play. I thought I had a great team going into the season. I had no less than 5 pitchers who were either the #1 or #2 guy in their rotation (Johan Santana, Jake Peavy, Dan Haren, Josh Beckett and Chris Young - I later dropped Young when he was smashed in the face with a Pujols line drive, and replaced him with Pedro Martinez, I also picked up Kyle Lohse along the way). I traded Josh Beckett for Albert Pujols (my #1 fantasy baseball rule - get Albert Pujols first, regardless of where the pre-season "experts" put him). And for some time this season I was in first place.
However, a bad last few weeks sunk me to 7th place as we entered the playoffs. I ended up in the consolation bracket for a shot at hanging on to the honor of 7th place. As a consequence, I ended up with a bye week this week. And what happens on the first day of this bye week?
C - Jason Varitek; 1 run, 1 RBI, 1 HR
1B - Albert Pujols; 1 run, 2 RBI, 1 HR
2B - Jeff Kent goes on the DL (okay, so not everybody had an awesome day...)
SS - Stephen Drew; goes 5-5, hits for the cycle; 3 runs, 1 RBI, 1 HR
3B - Casey Blake; 2 runs, 1 RBI, 1 HR, 1 SB
OF's - Ankiel and Griffey both ride the pine for the day and Willingham goes 0-2; while Sheffield, who is sitting on my bench, hits a solo HR
Let's also not forget my pitchers:
Santana - 6IP, 10K's, 3.00 ERA and 1.33 WHIP
Cordero - .2IP, 1 save, 0.00 ERA and WHIP
Ah, the joys of baseball...
My team didn't finish very strong this year in the regular season play. I thought I had a great team going into the season. I had no less than 5 pitchers who were either the #1 or #2 guy in their rotation (Johan Santana, Jake Peavy, Dan Haren, Josh Beckett and Chris Young - I later dropped Young when he was smashed in the face with a Pujols line drive, and replaced him with Pedro Martinez, I also picked up Kyle Lohse along the way). I traded Josh Beckett for Albert Pujols (my #1 fantasy baseball rule - get Albert Pujols first, regardless of where the pre-season "experts" put him). And for some time this season I was in first place.
However, a bad last few weeks sunk me to 7th place as we entered the playoffs. I ended up in the consolation bracket for a shot at hanging on to the honor of 7th place. As a consequence, I ended up with a bye week this week. And what happens on the first day of this bye week?
C - Jason Varitek; 1 run, 1 RBI, 1 HR
1B - Albert Pujols; 1 run, 2 RBI, 1 HR
2B - Jeff Kent goes on the DL (okay, so not everybody had an awesome day...)
SS - Stephen Drew; goes 5-5, hits for the cycle; 3 runs, 1 RBI, 1 HR
3B - Casey Blake; 2 runs, 1 RBI, 1 HR, 1 SB
OF's - Ankiel and Griffey both ride the pine for the day and Willingham goes 0-2; while Sheffield, who is sitting on my bench, hits a solo HR
Let's also not forget my pitchers:
Santana - 6IP, 10K's, 3.00 ERA and 1.33 WHIP
Cordero - .2IP, 1 save, 0.00 ERA and WHIP
Ah, the joys of baseball...
Learning on the Run
I've been in my current position as associate pastor for just over a year now. It's been a wild ride so far. There is so much to ministry that you don't learn about, even from great seminary. I'm theologically and biblically on solid ground, but practically, I have a long ways to go. I've grown a lot in the past year, but sometimes, I still feel like I'm running in circles. The past few weeks have afforded me a couple of opportunities to deal with difficult issues in ministry that I will probably face again.
There have been two issues that have been pretty major that I've had to deal with, and while neither of these situations have been particularly pleasant, they have taught me a lot, just in the past month, about some of the things that I never would have learned in seminary. Hopefully these issues are resolved at this point, but the joy of ministry is that you've never seen everything. Something new will come up in the near future, and I'll probably be putting up another post about exciting challenges. The good news is that I'm not alone. Everyone in ministry faces some sort of new challenge on a monthly, or even weekly, basis. The key is knowing that there are other founts of wisdom from which to draw, and that God is always there, just waiting for us to seek Him in the situation.
There have been two issues that have been pretty major that I've had to deal with, and while neither of these situations have been particularly pleasant, they have taught me a lot, just in the past month, about some of the things that I never would have learned in seminary. Hopefully these issues are resolved at this point, but the joy of ministry is that you've never seen everything. Something new will come up in the near future, and I'll probably be putting up another post about exciting challenges. The good news is that I'm not alone. Everyone in ministry faces some sort of new challenge on a monthly, or even weekly, basis. The key is knowing that there are other founts of wisdom from which to draw, and that God is always there, just waiting for us to seek Him in the situation.