NL MVP & Cy Young Thoughts

The MLB awards season finished this past Tuesday with the unsurprising NL MVP being St. Louis Cardinals' first baseman Albert Pujols. Here are some random stats to marvel in the greatness of El Hombre:
  • 9th season in the league and has yet to have less than .300 BA, 30 HR's & 100 RBI's. His career lows in those categories would be career highs for some people. (Just for the record, combining his worst stats in those categories would be a .314/32/103 season... that's the worst he has done!)
  • 10th 3 time winner of the MVP
  • 10th back-to-back MVP winner
  • 15th unanimous MVP in baseball history (first since Bonds in 2002)
  • 3rd MVP award in the last 5 years
  • 2nd in MVP voting 3 times, 3rd once, and 4th once (You read that right, 9 seasons in the league, and Top 4 in the MVP voting 8 times.)
  • 4th most MVP votes of all time behind only Barry Bonds, Stan Musial and Ted Williams
  • Oh, and one more number... he's only 29 years old.
Shifting gears from the season's biggest no-brainer to the one award that made me wonder if people had any brains (NL Cy Young). Now, there's no doubt that I am biased here, being a Cardinal fan; however, how in the world does Lincecum win the Cy Young over either Carpenter or Wainwright, let alone both?

Here's your basic numbers:
Wainwright - 19-8, 2.63 ERA, 212 K's, 233 IP in 34 G
Lincecum - 15-7, 2.48 ERA, 261 K's, 225.1 IP in 32 G
Carpenter - 17-4, 2.24 ERA, 144 K's, 192.2 IP in 28 G

Here's what an average game would look like, based on those numbers:
Wainwright - 6.85IP, 2.04 ER, 6.24 K's
Lincecum - 7.04IP, 1.93 ER, 8.15 K's
Carpenter - 6.88IP, 1.74 ER, 5.14 K's

All three of them are fairly even with the biggest difference being in the K's category. Are strikeouts that much more important than wins or ERA? Carpenter and Wainwright both pitch in a system where the ground ball is emphasized, so naturally, they will strike out fewer batters. What we got here was a race between the leaders in ERA (Carpenter), Wins (Wainwright) and Strikeouts (Lincecum). Apparently, strikeouts are more important than wins or ERA.

Some stats on Wainwright's season:
  • He allowed more than 3 earned runs 7 times in 34 starts; the Cardinals won five of those starts.
  • He allowed 2 earned runs or less in 26 of 34 starts; the Cardinals lost eight of those starts
  • He allowed 3 earned runs in one start; the Cardinals lost
  • He had 7 no-decisions this season; in only one did he allow more than 2 earned runs.
  • In a 12 start stretch during July and August, he pitched 88 innings and allowed 12 earned runs. That's an ERA of 1.23 for 1/3rd of the season.
  • He also had 3 games of 10+ strikeouts.
How 'bout Carpenter:
  • Carp had 7 no-decisions this seasons, and in them, he pitched 46 innings and allowed 8 earned runs; that's a 1.56 ERA in games where he didn't get a decision.
  • In his 4 (yes, 4) loses, he pitched 25 innings and allowed 19 earned runs (that's an ERA of 6.84) . That means, in the other 24 games (and 167.2 innings) that he pitched, he only allowed 29 earned runs. Let that sink in for a minute... it's a 1.55 ERA for 24 games.
  • He also had 3 games of 10+ strikeouts.
And Lincecum:
  • He had 5 starts out of 32 where he allowed more than 3 earned runs, and the Giants won one of those games.
  • In his 10 no-decisions, he pitched 65 innings and allowed 24 earned runs. That's an ERA of 3.32.
  • The Giants were 14-7 when he allowed 2 runs or less; he had a no-decision in 6 of those games.
  • In his 7 loses, he allowed 23 earned runs (for an ERA of 4.77), in the other 25 games (and 182 innings), he allowed 39 earned runs for an ERA of 1.92.
  • He also had 8 games of 10+ strikeouts.
Just for fun, what would their records have been if they had 3 runs of support in every game:
(<3 allowed =" W," allowed =" ND,">3 ER allowed = L)
Wainwright: 26-7, with 1 no-decision
Carpenter: 20-3, with 5 no decisions
Lincecum: 21-4, with 7 no decisions

It was certainly a tight race, and all three candidates were deserving in some respect. I just really feel like Lincecum got it because of his strikeout numbers, which is bogus. Carpenter and Wainwright pitch in a "to contact" philosophy that does a fantastic job of getting people to hit into double plays, not overwhelm them with a strikeout.

("Where's the proof?" you ask. Carpenter induced 23 DPs, Wainwright 18, Pineiro led the league with 29, and even Wellemeyer induced 20; that's 4 Cardinals in the top 20 in the league. Lincecum induced 9 DPs, and the top Giants pitcher was Zito with 19, then a reliever. To get the top 4 Giants pitchers, you have to get all the way down to #70 in the league.)

I still think that a Cardinal should have brought home the hardware... but I'm biased.

Fantasy Football 2009, Week 11

The good times just keep rollin'.... and something completely unexpected; I believe a first for me in fantasy football.

Team 1: Yahoo! League - Team Swish
QB - P. Manning
WR - D. Driver, M. Crabtree, S. Rice
RB - D. Williams, M. Forte
TE - J. Witten
K - N. Rackers
DEF - Arizona

High scorer: Sidney Rice, 20.90 points
Low scorer: Neil Rackers, 3 points
Result: Swish 91.26, Ilikepie 84.32 (8-3, 2nd overall)

Team 2: ESPN League Bricksquad - Veedersburg Killer Wombats
QB - P. Rivers
RB - J. Addai, A. Peterson
WR - H. Ward, R. Wayne, K. Walter
TE - T. Gonzalez
D/ST - Vikings
K - M. Prater

High scorer: Hines Ward, 18 points
Low scorer: Matt Prater, 3 points
Result: Veedersburg Killer Wombats 88, Silo Nightmare 88 (8-2-1, 1st place Division 2)
*This is the first. I don't believe I've ever had a week that ended in a tie. It happens all the time in fantasy baseball, but it's very rare in football (at least I think it is...).

Team 3: ESPN League Swish's Pals - Hillsboro Rabid Monkeys
QB - D. Brees
RB - P. Thomas, R. Rice, C. Williams
WR - R. White, S. Rice
TE - T. Gonzalez
D/ST - Bengals
K - D. Carpenter

High scorer: Drew Brees, 25 points
Low scorer: Cadillac Williams, 3 points
Result: Hillsboro Rabid Monkeys 101, Steel Curtain Reborn 91 (8-3, 1st place overall)

Expectations and Reality

The following was preached at Veedersburg and Hillsboro UMC on Sunday, November 22, 2009. The text for this week's message is John 18:33-37.

It may seem like an odd time of the year to be looking at today’s passage. After all, it’s not Good Friday, and we aren’t in the middle of the season of Lent, which is when you would expect to hear this particular passage. Really, on the surface, there is no reason why we should be looking at John 18 in the middle of November. We would assume that the lectionary would give us some kind of passage on how important it is for us to give thanks. Thanksgiving is this week, so surely there is something related to giving that would be more appropriate this time of the year. It defies our expectations of what we should be reading in mid-November. But sometimes, our expectations need a little recalibration. Sometimes our expectations and our assumptions do not line up with the reality that surrounds us.

What I want to do this morning is walk through the passage one step at a time and look at some of the expectations that were blown out of the water. Then I want to take a few minutes to talk about some of the expectations that we might have, and see if we need to do a bit of self-calibration as well.

First off, let’s get the full picture in view. These few verses are found in the larger section of John’s gospel where we begin to look at Jesus’ final day on earth. At the beginning of John 18, Jesus goes out to the garden with his disciples. He knows what is going to happen, but he goes anyway. We all have at least a very vague sense of what happens there. The gist of it is that Judas shows up with a handful of Jewish officers, and Jesus is arrested.

The soldiers take Jesus to see the father-in-law of the high priest, Annas, who himself was the high priest a decade or so before this takes place. Then he is taken to Caiaphas, who is the high priest at the time. John skips most of the details of what happens at this trial, if it can be called that. But we know from the other gospels that Jesus is accused of blasphemy and, according to Jewish law, this is a crime punishable by death.
However, what’s the political situation at the time? The Romans are the ones that are in control, and as such, they are the only ones who can sentence somebody to death. In order for the Jewish law to be carried out, Jesus needs to be given capital punishment by the Romans. So, the Jewish leaders take Jesus to Ponitus Pilate, the governor of the region.

Because it is on the eve of the Passover, the Jewish leaders refuse to enter into Pilate’s residence. Doing so would make them ritually unclean and, consequently, unable to take part in the Passover meal. Now, first of all, I find this to be quite ironic. These Jewish leaders have no problem wrongfully trying Jesus in the middle of the night; trumping up bogus charges, gathering false witnesses, and falsely accusing him of a crime that is punishable by death. However, they don’t want to go into the house of a Gentile because it will make them unclean. Makes you wonder a bit about priorities, doesn’t it?

Secondly, I image that it is pretty early in the morning. Remember, they arrested Jesus in the garden after he and his disciples had their last meal together. The trial went on through the night. I cannot see any way in which Pilate would have been in a welcoming, receptive mood, which, of course, may have been exactly what they wanted in the first place. Can you imagine somebody waking you up in the morning wanting you to settle a case that you don’t even really care about? I think Pilate’s first words may have been unrepeatable, and his second words would have been somewhere along the lines of, “What do you want?”

Right before today’s passage, we are told that Pilate does ask why they brought Jesus to him. He wants to know what accusation they have against him. And notice how vague their response is, verse 30, “If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.” Another reason why I think this was really early in the morning – that kind of logic only works in the morning. Seriously though, Pilate tells them to judge him themselves, to which they reply, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.”

Now, this would have done one of two things. First, it would have made Pilate wonder what was so bad that they would want to execute this Jesus-guy, and second, it probably would have made him even grumpier. He’s just trying to pass it off so that he can go back to sleep, but they just won’t let it go. And this is the state that Pilate is in when we come to today’s passage – tired, grumpy and pretty annoyed.

So, Pilate walks back into the headquarters where Jesus is sitting in a chair in the middle of the room with a giant interrogation spotlight shining down on him. And tired, grumpy, annoyed Pilate gets straight to the point, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Now, this is a very politically focused question. Pilate’s major role as governor was to ensure that people paid taxes to Rome and that they didn’t rebel. There were a handful of rebellions during Pilate’s reign in Jerusalem, and they were typically dealt with swiftly and decisively. Pilate wants to know whether or not Jesus poses some kind of political threat to the Roman establishment.

Pilate knew that members of the Herodian family were officially kings throughout Judea, and had been for some time. Perhaps you remember the story of Jesus’ birth when Herod the Great was king. His sons were now the ones who were put in place as kings by the Roman Emperor. Pilate wants to make sure that Jesus isn’t making some kind of claim to the kingship of Judea. By doing that, Jesus would be committing treason against the Roman Empire, an offense punishable by death.

But Jesus does something unexpected. He turns the questioning around on Pilate. This is totally unheard of. Pilate, already in a grumpy mood, would not like to be questioned by this Galilean, because, according to one resource I read this week, Galileans were like the hillbillies of Judea. He is totally destroying any sense of social order. It would have totally thrown off Pilate.

Jesus’ question here is very piercing for us as well. He says to Pilate, “Do you say this of your own accord, or did others say it to you about me?” In other words, do we declare Jesus to be our Lord and Savior simply because everyone else around us is doing so, or do we make that confession of our own accord? Is our faith a product of socialization? Do we believe because everyone around us does, or is it because we have been affected by the living God?

That is a crucial question that we all need to ask ourselves from time to time, and we have to be honest about the answer as well. If our faith is just a matter of socialization, or “that’s the way we were raised,” then it is a shallow faith. Our faith needs to be a dynamic relationship with the living God, not just something that we do for a couple hours each week. The church is not a social club. It is a gathering of people seeking after God, trying to make sense of the world around them. Do we say that Jesus is our Lord and Savior of our own accord, or do we say it because that’s what others are saying?

We have a choice when we start asking ourselves these questions. We can honestly look at ourselves and evaluate where we are in our faith, or we can get frustrated with the questions and ignore them. When Jesus asks Pilate this question, he does a little bit of both. You get the sense that he is a little more annoyed, especially given that the roles have been reversed – Jesus was the one asking the questions, not Pilate. But Pilate also begins to understand that there is maybe something more going on behind the scenes.

Pilate’s response in verse 35 shows signs of empathy. Pilate is trying to show that he is really impartial. All Pilate really cares about is whether or not Jesus is committing treason against the Roman Empire. Does he pose a threat to the Roman order in Judea? Pilate points out that it was the Jews and the chief priests that brought Jesus to be questioned and executed. And now, he wants to know what it was that Jesus did to get them so riled up.

I think, in Jesus’ response, we see Jesus framing his understanding of what is going on. When Jesus says that his kingdom is not of this world, which he says twice in verse 36, he is alluding to the book of Daniel, which, of course, Pilate probably doesn’t know anything about. But in Daniel, chapters 2 and 7, there is talk of God establishing a kingdom that will never be destroyed. Jesus is basically saying that he has a kingdom that is different than anything else Pilate has ever seen or heard of, a heavenly kingdom. It doesn’t pose a threat to the Roman Empire. It is not that type of kingdom. It is a kingdom not of this world.

Pilate latches onto Jesus’ talk of kingdom and asks him if he is indeed a king. It is almost as if Pilate still doesn’t quite understand what Jesus is talking about, but he knows there is something different going on than what he expected. Finally, Pilate is open to hear what it is that Jesus has to say.

And Jesus tells Pilate what his purpose is. Jesus lets Pilate know why he was born – to bear witness to the truth. Pilate was expecting a day just like any other. Pilate was expecting to talk with some guy who was planning treason against the occupying Roman forces. Pilate was expecting to address a potential threat. The reality is that Pilate had a profound encounter with the truth, in the form of Jesus Christ. This Jewish hillbilly was far beyond anything that Pilate expected. The reality is that Jesus is far beyond anything that we expect as well.

What is interesting about the lectionary reading is that it too is not what we would expect. It is not a story about giving or being thankful. It doesn’t even give us the full story of what happens afterwards. If we just look at today’s reading, we don’t know that Pilate could find no fault with Jesus and was willing to let him go.

According to the Christian calendar, today is Christ the King Sunday. It is a time when we celebrate the kingship of Jesus before we enter into the time of preparation known as Advent. When we hear about a king, we expect all the bells and whistles that come with royalty, but in Jesus, we don’t get what we expect.
We get a king whose kingdom is not of this world. We get a king who gently breaks down our barriers and opens us up to seeing that there is far more to this life around us than we realize. We get a king who wants us to know him in a very real way; a king unlike any other king that we have ever seen before. We also get a king who challenges us to hear his voice; to seek after the truth, and that is our challenge this week. Can we look at our lives and truly say that Jesus Christ is king?

Fantasy Football 2009, Week 10

Great week in fantasy land!

Team 1: Yahoo! League - Team Swish
QB - P. Manning
WR - D. Driver, M. Crabtree, S. Rice
RB - D. Williams, J. Addai
TE - J. Witten
K - N. Rackers
DEF - Baltimore

High scorer: Peyton Manning, 27.08 points
Low scorer: Jason Witten, 4.70 points
Result: Swish 123.68, azz lighting 96.24 (7-3, 2nd place overall)

Team 2: ESPN League - Veedersburg Killer Wombats
QB - P. Rivers
RB - A. Peterson, J. Addai
WR - H. Ward, R. Wayne, D. Hester
TE - T. Gonzalez
D/ST - Vikings

High scorer: Reggie Wayne, 24 points
Low scorer: Hines Ward, 2 points
Result: Veedersburg Killer Wombats 107, VA Bengals 52 (8-2, 1st place, Division 2)

Team 3: ESPN League - Hillsboro Rabid Monkeys
QB - D. Brees
RB - P. Thomas, R. Rice
WR - S. Rice, D. Hester, M. Crabtree
TE - T. Gonzalez
D/ST - Ravens
K - Dan Carpenter

High scorer: Ravens Defense/Special Teams, 24 points
Low scorer: Pierre Thomas, 3 points
Result: Hillsboro Rabid Monkeys 107, Team Maple 70 (7-3, 1st place overall)

Changing the Systems

The following was preached at Veedersburg and Hillsboro UMC on Sunday, November 15, 2009. The text for this week's passage is Hebrews 10:11-25.

We are looking at the book of Hebrews today. It’s one of those books that sometimes gets overlooked when we think about books of the Bible. Not a whole lot is known about the history of the book, or more accurately, letter. It is an odd bit of literature in the New Testament because it is not addressed to anyone in particular, nor is the author ever explicitly identified. It was traditionally labeled as “to the Hebrews” reflecting the assumption that the original recipients were Jewish Christians. We have also traditionally attributed Hebrews to Paul, but this is far from certain in the circles of people who talk about such things. Perhaps more important than either the author or the audience, though, is the theme of the letter.

Hebrews is all about the supremacy of Christ. The author talks about Christ in comparison with the angels, the priests, and the old covenantal system. And in each case, Christ far surpasses what came before. There is an idea throughout the letter that something new has happened; that the Old Testament promises that God is going to do a new thing have finally come to fruition. In some sense, this letter is a celebration of the dawning of a new era. It’s exciting, it’s uncomfortable and it’s a little scary, as change always is, especially for those who are a part of the system that needs change. But often, as scary and uncomfortable as change can be, it is necessary in order to fulfill the purposes that God has set forth.

Today’s passage takes place in the section where Christ is compared to the priesthood, and, by extension and more specific to this part of the text, the whole sacrificial system. The sacrifices of the priest are compared to the sacrifice of Christ, and they are significantly different in two key ways.

First off, the sacrifices of the priest are offered daily. Day after day, the priest would offer sacrifices to take away the sins of the people. That’s what the sacrificial system was all about. Sin was committed and to atone for that sin, blood was shed. Often times, the priest might lay his hands on the sacrificial animal to symbolize the transference of guilt from the sinner to the animal. Every year, around the time of the Passover was the Day of Atonement. This is where a sacrificial lamb, a lamb without defect, was inspected by the high priest, and then slaughtered for the sins of the nation. It was an annual event, or at least it was until there came a time for a change.

When you read through the story of the Passion Week in the Gospel of John, you are reading about the Day of Atonement re-imagined. John writes the story in such a way that Jesus is the sacrificial lamb during one particular Passover. Jesus is the one that was inspected – by the high priest, by Pontius Pilate, by the Sanhedrin; Jesus was examined, he was without defect, and he was slaughtered.

In contrast with the priest’s sacrifice, Jesus was a one-time sacrifice. Jesus was a sacrifice that did not have to be offered day after day after day. We may need to come to Jesus and submit to Jesus each and every day, but the sacrifice was made, once and for all, on the cross. They system was changed.

The second major difference is implied in the first, but let’s get it out there. Why was it that the priests had to offer the sacrifice time and time again? Because it wasn’t enough. Verse 11 says that the priest repeatedly offers the same sacrifice, “which can never take away sins.” The sacrificial system wasn’t designed to take away sin; it was designed to temporarily atone for sin and to show us the seriousness of sin.

The reason why sacrifices had to be offered over and over again is because they never took away the sin. But Jesus does. Jesus was a one-time, single sacrifice for sin that was good for all time. There’s a reason why Jesus doesn’t come back and offer himself for each and every generation. His one-time sacrifice did what all the other sacrifices combined couldn’t do – it took away sin. It gave us the new possibility of living life without sin. But here’s the catch. It doesn’t happen all at once.

Wouldn’t that be wonderful? Wouldn’t it be great if we could just keep living our lives as though nothing really changes once we put our trust in Jesus? But the truth is, that doesn’t happen. You know it. You’ve seen it. You may be experiencing that right now in your life. We become more mature as Christians over time. It is a process in which the Holy Spirit is working within us and conforming us to the image of Christ.

Verse 14 says, “For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.” Are being sanctified. Notice, it doesn’t say, “those who are perfect,” or “those who are fully sanctified.” The Greek tense is very intentional here. It reveals a process that is taking place, not an immediate change. This is what our faith is: it’s a process by which we gradually change from within. If a person hasn’t been changed after giving his/her life to God, then something isn’t right. And what is true for individuals is true for the larger group as well.

A community of faith needs to change over time because God is at work, and God doesn’t leave us where we are as individuals. So, shouldn’t we expect God to be working in a new way in the community of faith? Remember the vision in Revelation 21? God doesn’t need our help to make vision a reality. Now, I don’t know about you, but I want to be a part of it. I would be happy to play even the slightest, tiniest, supporting role possible. Because it is exciting to be a part of what God is doing. And sometimes, the systems that we relied on in the past aren’t enough to get us to the place we want to be in the future.

The writer of Hebrews saw this. He is basically saying that the priesthood, as it was understood in Judaism at the time, is past its prime. No longer was it necessary for the priests to offer daily sacrifices because God did something new. In Jesus, the ultimate sacrifice was made for all time. Verse 16 is a quote from Jeremiah 31:33. Let me read it again, “This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my laws on their hearts, and write them on their minds.” And verse 17 comes from the same passage, “I will remember their sins and their lawless deeds no more.” Sin is wiped away because of the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. That is something that no priest could ever do.

Then, starting in verse 19, we get the “therefore.” Up to this point in the passage, it has been “because of that,” and now, we get the “therefore, do this.” The writer isn’t just going to tell the reader what has happened, but he calls them to action. And he does so with three “let us” phrases.

The first one, verse 22, “let us draw near.” We have confidence in Christ. We trust in Christ. Through Christ, we can have a clean conscience and enter into the presence of God. We can draw near to God because of the blood of Jesus Christ. That’s where we get a spiritual high; from being faithful and drawing near to the presence of God.

I’ve heard about something called a “runner’s high.” I don’t know exactly what that is, because I only run if there is a ball in play. But I do know what a spiritual high is. A spiritual high is when there is no doubt that the Holy Spirit is present and active in your midst. I remember one particular time when I was in high school. We were on a mission trip and had some great devotions one night. We circled up to pray, and I started shaking. It was Alabama in the middle of the summer; I wasn’t cold. We were praying, and I had my eyes closed, head down, and I didn’t dare look up. Because I knew, I knew without a doubt, that the Holy Spirit was right there with us.

I don’t tell you this so that you’ll be impressed with any kind of spiritual experience that I’ve had. Or to brag about what has happened in my life. I tell you this because that is what I want for this congregation. When we gather together, I want there to be no doubt that the Holy Spirit is present among us. I want people to walk into this church and say, “Wow. God is moving there.”

And I don’t want this because it makes me look good as the pastor, or because it makes us look good as a congregation; it’s not about how we appear to those around us. It’s about whether or not we are being faithful to the calling that God has placed on us. It is a process, a journey, and you don’t go through a process, or on a journey without moving somewhere. And in order to get somewhere, things need to change and adapt to new ways of doing things. Einstein is attributed with saying that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. We cannot expect to do things the same way time and time again, because the world around us is changing.

The second “let us” phrase is, “let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering,” found in verse 23. Do you trust in God? Do you believe that God can put the right people in the right place at the right time? Do you believe that God cares for the world? I do. I believe that God can use us to do amazing things if we are willing. It’s a decision that we have to make, and if we are willing, then we need to be ready to get pushed out of our comfort zone from time to time. And in those times, we have to hold fast to the hope we have in heaven.

God is faithful. God has promised to be with us, even through the difficult times in our lives. Be don’t think that means that things are always going to be easy and comfortable. God was with Joseph when his brothers sold him into slavery. God was with Joseph when he was wrongfully thrown into prison in Egypt. God was with Joseph when all others forgot about him. Things get difficult sometimes, but God is with us. And we have to hold fast to that hope.

Finally, the third one, “let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works,” verse 24. What should be our response to the sacrifice of Christ? Love and good works. And not just love and good works, but considering ways to encourage others to love and good works. This is why the community of faith is so important. Have you ever heard somebody say, “I can be a Christian without going to church”? In some sense, yes, you can, but in another, no, you can’t. The community of faith is crucial when it comes to developing as a Christian. We have accountability to grow together in the faith. We have encouragement when times are tough. We have people from whom we learn.

We have a decision to make when we read this passage. We can decide to be a church that is about moving forward and chasing after God, or we can decide to do the same things over and over again. We can shut ourselves off from the world around us, or we can reach out to the lost. As much as I was kidding around about District Conference last week, I’m glad I went because I heard something very powerful, and I want to share it with you. It’s is another decision that we have to make, and it is quite possibly the biggest decision that must be made.

We can decide to be preference-driven or purpose-centered. If we are purpose-centered, then we are focused on a given purpose. And I think that purpose is so clear when it comes to Scripture. Our purpose as disciples of Jesus Christ is to make disciples by reaching out and growing mature in the faith.

If we are preference-driven, then we are more concerned with making sure everything fits into either what we are used to, so that it is familiar and comfortable, or what we like, so that to be a part of our community, people have to conform to who we think they should be. Ultimately, whether we realize it or not, the systems that we set up end up being preference-driven by default. Unless we make the intentional decision to be purpose-centered, we will be preference-driven. And there’s nothing wrong with preferences, as long as it doesn’t get in the way of the mission of the church. These preferences should not drive what we do; that is what the purpose does.

The purpose is something larger than ourselves. The purpose is larger than any single person, than the preferences of a few people, than the church as a whole. The purpose is what causes us to get up in the morning and strive to be all that God would have us be. If we are purpose-centered, we make the intentional decision to listen for the call that God has placed on us. We are flexible enough to know that what worked 20 years ago isn’t necessarily going to work in today’s world.

When Jesus came, he dismantled all the systems that were in place. He challenged and changed the systems because, over time, systems need to be changed. There are some growing pains from time to time, just like when you were young and your legs would hurt from time to time as your muscles were growing. But, in the end, we can look back and be amazed at what God has done. But we have some decisions to make. Do we stick with the systems that got us to this point, or do we step out of our comfort zone just a little bit and see what God can do when we are willing? It is a decision that we all have to make.

Movie Tour: The Men Who Stare at Goats

It's been a while since there was a movie that I really wanted to see when it came out. Well, it was a week late, but Katie and I finally saw The Men Who Stare at Goats a day or so ago (I guess that really depends on when you are reading this!)

Plot Summary
Ewan McGregor plays a reporter from Ann Arbor, Michigan whose life falls apart and he decides to go to Iraq to find a story to write. While in Kuwait, he meets Lyn Cassady, a member of the military's secret psychic ops team. What follows is a misadventure of the two new friends, as well as history of the military program interspersed throughout.

Review
I really liked this movie. As Katie and I were talking about it afterwards, there wasn't any single part that stood out, but the movie as a whole was very enjoyable. I remember laughing throughout because Clooney and McGregor are both hilarious in their respective roles. McGregor does a great job of developing his character from one who thinks the whole story is insane (which it really is) to one who totally buys into the whole thing. Clooney is at his best in screwball comedic parts, and this is right in his wheelhouse.

What I found most interesting about this movie is that without a few curse words and an unnecessary brief nudity scene, this would easily be a PG-13 movie that could have had a wider appeal. However, because of these two things, it will not be enjoyed by as many people as possible.

Recommendation
If you can get past the handful of curse words and the unnecessary brief nudity, go see it. It will make you think, laugh and wonder at the same time and at different times throughout. It is definitely not your typical slapstick comedy, so it won't have mass appeal as far as that goes, but it is definitely a smart comedy that is worth your time.

Best Part
There is a running joke (at least I took it that way) about Ewan McGregor's character understanding and becoming a Jedi (Clooney refers to the people in this secret military operation as Jedi Knights). In case you are wondering why I find this to be so funny, then perhaps you missed that there were three more Star Wars movies that came out 1999 and following, and McGregor plays Obi-Wan Kenobi, a Jedi Knight. If you didn't know that.... well, how do you keep up with the world?

A close second (which, I know, I never do) is the opening scene when a military officer tries to run through the wall. Okay, that's a little slapstick for you.

Fantasy Football 2009, Week 9

This has been a fun week for me. In one league, I was matched up against a guy who decided to have his entire fantasy roster filled with players from the Detroit Lions (even on the bye week!). In another, I was matched up against my lovely wife. And in another, I was battling to hang onto first place and it was going to come down to MNF. Exciting week in fantasy land!

Team 1: Yahoo! League - Team Swish
QB - P. Manning
WR - D. Driver, M. Crabtree, Austin Collie
RB - D. Williams, J. Addai
TE - J. Witten
K - N. Rackers
DEF - Indianapolis

High scorer: DeAngelo Williams, 26.10 points
Low scorer: Austin Collie, 2.60 points
Result: Swish 109.22, Detroit Lions 51.50 (6-3, t-2nd overall, 3rd place points)

Team 2: ESPN League Brick Squad - Veedersburg Killer Wombats
QB - P. Rivers
RB - J. Addai, T. Hightower
WR - H. Ward, R. Wayne, D. Hester
TE - T. Gonzalez
D/ST - Patriots
K - M. Prater

High scorer: Joseph Addai, 22 points
Low scorer: Patriots, 3 points
Result: Veedersburg Killer Wombats 94, Gym Shortz Blueballs 82 (7-2, 1st place overall)

Team 3: ESPN League Swish's Pals - Hillsboro Rabid Monkeys
QB - D. Brees
RB - P. Thomas, R. Rice
WR - R. White, D. Hester, M. Crabtree
TE - T. Gonzalez
D/ST - Seahawks
K - Orlando Mare

High scorer: Ray Rice/Seahawks, 18 points each
Low scorer: Roddy White, 2 points
Result: Hillsboro Rabid Monkeys 103, Photogenic Apple Tots 92 (6-3, t-1st overall record, 2nd points)